 |
Reviews
<<< Back to reviews
The Illusionist
Hollywood has a new trend genre this year in the “period
piece, magician film”. This is the first of two that have made
it to a wide release; the second is The Prestige to be released in October.
The latter of the two is directed and co-written by Christopher Nolan
(Batman Begins and Memento). After seeing this particular film I am
convinced that Nolan’s is the better of the two. Now, on with
the review.
The Illusionist is directed and co-written by newbie Neil Burger and
based on a short story by Pulitzer Prize winning author Steven Millhauser.
The film stars Edward Norton as Eisenheim a turn of the century magician
who returns to Vienna after trek around the world, studying the art
of the illusionist. When he returns he is reunited with a childhood
love, Sophie (Jessica Beil). The issues they both had in their earlier
romance is one of class struggle, for Sophie is a duchess and Eisenheim
is the son of a carpenter. Sophie also has a larger issue in that she
is betrothed to Crown Prince Leopold, a real bastard of a man played
brilliantly by Rufus Sewell. Rounding out the cast is the always-reliable
Paul Giamatti as Chief Inspector Uhl, a man with close ties to the crown
yet is always conflicted between being a good officer and doing the
prince’s dirty work.
Eisenheim and Sophie rekindle their affair very quickly and make an
attempt to free her from her royal prison, yet those plans are cut short
by Leopold, as he dispatches of her in a brutal manner that he has apparently
done before and has his lackeys cover up for him. A distraught Eisenheim
is overcome with grief and now a lust for revenge. At the same time
Inspector Uhl is looking deeper into the investigation while investigating
Eisenheim himself. \
Overall the film is decent, though I found that it was trying to be
too many things and sort of loses sight of itself. First it starts off
as a study of the magician and argues a point of “Is it real or
not?” then goes into a story of forbidden love that turns into
a lame murder mystery that the audience knows the perpetrator, yet the
rest of the cast doesn’t, then shifts that all around and becomes
a revenge-con game. Despite this the performances are great, speaking
especially about Norton, who never seems to fail, yet is very engaging
in this particular role. Sewell has made a career of playing evil noblemen
and does it with much viciousness in this film. Beil is tragic and shows
much more potential in this role than in any other in her past. Finally
Giamatti ties the rest of the film together as the conflicted inspector
who is caught dead center in a class struggle of his own and happens
to pull off a slight accent, as does the rest of the cast.
The cinematography, by Dick Pope, is lush and bright and manages to
pull off some nice effects to simulate the film style of the time period,
with scenes beginning with the slow opening of the circular lens aperture
and the opening credits in a sepia tone with a slight jump in the titles.
The score by Phillip Glass is haunting and probably one of his best
due to the orchestrated, cinematic overtures as apposed to his standard
electronic experimentalism.
Despite the film’s faults with an uncontainable plot, the film
is watchable due to its performances and cinematography as well as the
effects during an of Eisenheim’s performances. Like I said earlier,
though this film might have made it out first, I believe the best is
yet to come with The Prestige.
6.5
George
<<< Back to reviews |
 |
 |